Add docs explaining SIMP architectural decisions

Description

There should be a place in the documentation where some architecture or infrastructure decisions that may be abnormal are explained, like:

  • How SIMP assumes an admin would manage packages

  • How SIMP assumes people want to provision their systems (kickstart)

  • How SIMP assumes an admin would want to distribute large files (rsync)

The security_conop guide is thorough and explains a lot of these types of assumptions, but we should further explain things that would confuse a new admin, even if they have set up their own infrastructure before.

Acceptance Criteria

None

Activity

Show:
Trevor Vaughan
October 12, 2016, 7:55 PM

Good idea, this should probably be elevated to an Epic and then each individual section broken out as stories.

Epic Link

Story Points

None

Components

Assignee

Kara Pritchard

Priority

High