...
Info |
---|
Add your comments directly to the page. Include links to any relevant research, data, or feedback. |
Page Properties | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Background
At some point in the past, the simp-adapter
RPM was created with the primary purpose of downloading the appropriate version of puppet
for your system. This spawned two different RPM result sets of simp-adapter-foss
and simp-adapter-pe
both of which provide simp-adapter
so that the underlying RPMs don't have to worry about figuring out which one is required.
...
This was spawned by the conversation started on the initial r10k
prototyping work PR.
As a corollary, we should probably take a good hard look at what the RPM is doing in the %post
section and determine if this is actually still necessary and/or should be in this RPM instead of in the simp config
command or the like.
Options considered
Option 1: | Option 2: | Option 3: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description | Persist the simp-adapter-foss and simp-adapter-pe installation packages with puppet dependencies. | Push all puppet dependencies down to the individual modules | Push all puppet dependencies into the simp RPM. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Pros and cons | Allows for a two-package installation of the entire stack if your repositories are set up correctly. Having | Probably the most accurate mechanism May allow for a one-package installation with May have to persist a package to version matrix to determine what version of puppet is in what upstream package. Will probably require a re-roll of all modules with a version bump just for this. (If so, this should wait until after 6.4.0 so that we can get the | Allows for a one-package installation with Eliminates the possibility of installing individual components via RPM without dragging in the entire stack and reduces the Would change a lot of long-held RPM couplings and require the most amount of testing to achieve and should wait until after 6.4.0 if selected. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated cost |
|
|
|
Option 4: | Option 5: | Option 6: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description | Add a new RPM whose sole purpose is to pin the version of This was the original goal of | Remove simp-adapter-pe, making simp-adapter-foss default, and add a simp-adapter-unbounded to allow un-pinned versions of Puppet as stated in Option 4 | Remove any requirements for Puppet or Puppetserver and move validation to simp-cli | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pros and Cons | Easily allows users to un-pin from the underlying version of puppet Does not require a full release of SIMP for compatible version bumps or pinning (we've had to work around broken versions of Does not require a re-roll of all modules Easy to implement Makes it easy to determine when the system has been purposefully deviated from the tested installation state Allows users to create a system where versions of puppet can be installed that were not evaluated with the SIMP stack and may cause support difficulties. | All Pluses/Minuses from Option 4, plus: Allows for a single command install (yum install simp) Allows Bolt, Ansible, etc. Still creates user confusion Testing scenarios we don't currently cover | Don't need to worry about Puppet changes Can be used with Bolt, Ansible, etc w/o having to add/test new adapters If people don't read instructions, they could create a broken environment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated cost |
|
|
|