...
Option 1: | Option 2: | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Update SIMP Repositories to match the structure: 'rubygem-<module_name>' 'simp-<module_name>' | Status Quo | |||||||
Pros and cons | Community recognized/used structure RPM names would match repo names, preventing confusion Future modules would follow new structure Ability to easily automate RPM builds and downloads with consistent naming scheme Prevents having to dig to determine which RPM belongs to which repo (see simp-rsync and simp-rsync-skeleton) Permanent redirects from Github prevent broken links Documentation would need to be updated Could be confusing for existing customers | No work to be done Organizational structure remains confusing and not easily discoverable Different names for repo, module, and RPM for same upstream | ||||||
Votes | 12 | 0 | ||||||
Supporters: | Brandon Kendall | |||||||
Estimated cost |
|
...