Creating “slim” stream mirrors of modular RPM packages enables the SIMP ISO to support modularity while still mix/matching specific RPMs from various sources. For instance, it permits adding a few epel-modular
packages without distributing epel-modular
's entire collection of modules x streams x packages.
See https://simp-project.atlassian.net/wiki/pages/resumedraft.action?draftId=2193326084 for a summary of motivating challenges and requirements .
Process
The “slim” mirroring process must happen during/before the ISO build process.
At the same time each modular RPM is acquired, save its source repo’s modulemd metadata.
Use unique N:S:V:C:A combinations from the resulting modular RPMs to determine which “slim” module streams to reconstruct.
For each unique “slim” modular stream: generate modulemd metadata for all relevant RPMs
Combine all “slim” modules' modulemd data into a single data structure and write it to
modules.yaml
Rebuild the modular repository using
createrepo_c
(orcreaterepo_mod
) with the newmodules.yaml
file
Implementing slim modular repos
repomd.xml XML root is namespaced; causes XPath trouble
(Example: repodata/repomd.xml)
Without the
repomd
namespace, the XPath is simply://data[@type='modules']/location/@href
However the <repomd> is namespaced, so unless we define the namespace in the calling code, an XPath-only solution will need to be something hacky, like:
/[name()='repomd']/[name()='data'][@type="modules"]/*[name()='location']/@href
Modular RPM data/metadata to get/record/cache
At a minimum, a new field (only required for modular RPMs) that specifies the N:S (module:stream) for modular packages should be added to the build’s packages.yaml
.
Problems that are probably solved
yumdownloader
can’t see RPMs in modules/streams that aren’t enabled
TODO Add an optional field to
packages.yaml
entries to specify the N:S: for each modular RPMTODO Identify and enable all unique N: from
packages.yaml
(fail if there are conflicting S:)TODO
dnf module enable
each N:S: before beginning to useyumdownloader
TODO Individual
yumdownloader
runs can change repository mirrors, which may be out of sync with each other and have different modulemd data.TODO UNSOLVED? (When using the
yumdownloader
) the modulemd metadata must be fetched at the same time as the RPM is downloaded, in order to preserve the precise state of that RPM’s modular metadata.
A single RPM could be part of multiple streams in an upstream repository
Nothing in the modulemd data prevents this, so we need a way to determine the correct stream.
TODO This isn’t a problem for External packages, because we will already need to add a field to explicitly set N:S: to packages.yaml
.
However: there is no way to hint streams in *pkglist.txt files for minimal BaseOS packages (unless we do something elaborate, like add comment keywords and a parser)
TODO Most BaseOS EL8 modules have a default stream; use the default stream if it exists
TODO If there is only a single stream, default to the only stream.
This is hacky, but it will work for EL8.3—Base OS (i.e., AppStream) modules without a default stream are currently very rare, and at the moment all of them have a single stream:# dnf module --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=appstream list | grep -v '\[d\]' CentOS Linux 8 - AppStream Name Stream Profiles Summary 389-ds 1.4 389 Directory Server (base) libselinux-python 2.8 common Python 2 bindings for libselinux mod_auth_openidc 2.3 Apache module suporting OpenID Connect authentication parfait 0.5 common Parfait Module pki-core 10.6 PKI Core module for PKI 10.6 or later pki-deps 10.6 PKI Dependencies module for PKI 10.6 or later
NOT IN 6.6.0 UNSOLVED This leaves open a potential edge-case: if in the future, we require an RPM from a Base OS modules without a default stream but ships with multiple streams (again, current population: 0), it will fail and there is no way to hint
NOT IN 6.6.0 We should probably have a way of formally declaring N:S for
*pkglist.txt
Base OS RPMs in the future. Some possibilities:A separate
*pkglist.modularity.txt
fileN:S-declaring directives in the comments of
*pkglist.txt
Could this be combined with
packages.yaml
? (not without a major rewrite)
Unsolved problems
What are the “Fetch RPM” flow differences between Base OS (prune_packages
) & External (yumdownloader
) packages?
- SIMP-9643Getting issue details... STATUS
How can we know the URL/path to an RPM’s source repo’s repomd.xml file?
- SIMP-9644Getting issue details... STATUS
This is simple enough to do by hand for an individual package, but I’m not sure how to automate it yet. Here are some ideas:
Option 1: see ifyumdownloader
can be convinced to display the repo root’s URL, like--urls
does with the RPMI haven’t found an option that does this
Option 2: walk up the dir tree until we find metadata (hacky, expensive)Option 3: (somehow) find/define the DNF cache that was used to download the RPM and (somehow) fish out the modulemd data that was used for that specific package
Option 4: Do it the other way around:
Before getting packages, get a repo’s repomd.xml file first, then use it to find the xxx-packages.yaml.gz
read the modulemd data from the packages.yaml file
filter the modulemd data down to just the streams and packages you need
then run
yumdownloader
to acquire those exact packages
Separate yumdownloader
runs may result in RPMs for the same N:S having different N:S:V:C:A
Different RPMs could be sourced from different versions (V:) of the same module stream if yumdownloader
pulls them from different repo mirrors that are out of sync with each other. Using the heuristic of a “slim” module stream per unique N:S:V:C:A , this would result in multiple module streams instead of one.
This is a rare edge case that V: is specifically intended to catch, and it seems correct to fail instead of building a “mirrored” stream subset using RPMs from a different (stream) versions. However, I can’t demonstrate that the potential impact of this scenario is worth prioritizing its implementation.
The strongest impacts I came up with so far rely on the fact that there’s a good chance that, between two stream versions, the combined set of downloaded RPMs won’t be a precise subset of either stream. But unless the mirrors were really out of sync, this probably wouldn’t matter. The stream version is a snapshot in time of all the modulemd (modular) metadata for the stream—it doesn’t actually affect its RPMs' resolutions.
(I honestly don’t know many details of how/when V: is used other than “highest wins”, but it might lead to weird edge cases:)
There’s a (staggeringly) remote change that the newer stream version dropped package(s) or one of its packages has a new dependency
The slim repo will use one N:S:V or the other, but neither upstream precisely matches its RPMs. After re-integrating with the full upstream repo or mirror, DNF might miss an update by deciding it already know the stream version resolve using the wrong stream version for some of the packages, to the wrong versions, miss updates
There may be other reasons to do with inter-modular dependencies.
TL;DR: Not sure if failing is the best way forward—input welcome.
For the time being, I am treating this as a don’t-have-to-solve problem
Are there conditions where streams don’t provide C:A information when packages are noarch?
No. By the time they are built, they will have a context and arch.
Undecided
[Should/how to] persist cached modulemd metadata for already-downloaded RPMs between builds?
The current yumdownloader
process
True or false: “Any mirrored “slim” module MUST NOT have multiple streams”
This sounds reasonable, but is it actually true?
It’s impossible to install multiple streams on a single SIMP server, but do we think we’d need to package multiple “slim” module streams for agents?
My current inclination is to assume “no.” Given our approach toward modularity in general, that seems like a really edgy edge case.